The verdict

It’s extremely hard to see why Lloyd was chosen before Sam Kerr. Lloyd’s main saving grace appears to be her skill and influence within the world’s number one ranked nation, but that withstanding, there are few individual reasons why Lloyd deserves to be in the three finalists for World Player of the Year.

Marten’s choice is less controversial. Germany had dominated the Euros for 22 years, so the Netherland’s victory was both overdue and highly surprising.

The style with which Martens impressed was highly reminiscent of the skillful flair and speed that dominates the male Player of the Year awards, but has not featured heavily in the women’s version since Marta’s three titles.

Castellanos, despite being a sensation in women’s football, is another surprising inclusion on this list.

She’s been playing at a lower level then every other player in the ten original nominees, and her inclusion over Kerr suggests that the W-League may not attract the appropriate respect among foreign adjudicators. 

It’s doubtful that FIFA will respond to the selection controversy, but there are significant questions hanging over their criteria and processes. To continue to grow the women’s side of the game, the importance of prestigious awards cannot be overstated.

The game revolves around it's stars and they need to be properly acknowledged. They're the greatest asset the sport has.

Which is why it's important that Kerr carries on letting her feet do the talking. At the moment, they're one of the powerful voices in the game.