According to Kamasz, a former general manager of the National Soccer League, Sydney FC general manager and interim chief executive with Football NSW, the FFA board needs to address key questions including:

• If there is indeed a supposed toxic culture involving other members of staff, why have there not been any other sackings?

• Has the Board seen the complete PFA Report including the number of participants and their status (eg current Matildas’, others, etc.)?

• Does the Board know exactly which players were targeted, the criteria for involvement and if they were the only people who were approached and responded?

• It has been suggested in the media that 32 players were approached.  Is this correct? Were they all “eligible” to participate and did they all respond?

• Is the Board absolutely satisfied that the respondents were exactly who they were supposed to be?

• Was anyone outside the targeted Matildas’ group in the survey approached to participate, and if so, why?

• Who in FFA has been responsible for obtaining and dealing with the results of the survey?

• Can the Board be satisfied that the Report correctly reflects the responses provided?

• Was Alen Stajcic provided with a copy of the Report and was his input sought?

• The PFA has indicated that there was nothing in the Report to warrant a sacking.  Is this correct?

• If this was not the case, why was the survey referenced publicly in Alen Stajic’s sacking?   

• Was the Report actually a factor in the recommendation that Alen Stajcic be sacked?

Our Watch Report

• Why were Our Watch contacted by FFA?

• On who’s recommendation, and in what context, was their involvement requested?

• Which group of people (not names) were required to complete the survey (eg ex-Matildas, current Matildas, parents, coaching and ancillary staff etc.)?

• How many people were provided with surveys to complete?

• Were these surveys password protected or guaranteed to be secure?

• Who in FFA determined the number and which people should participate in the survey?

• It has been suggested in the media that some 280 surveys were issued and that 142 responses were received, with only 3 of these from Matildas and 1 from a Socceroo.  Is this correct?

• Why weren’t all members of the Matildas’ staff involved in the survey?

• Who in FFA has been responsible for obtaining and dealing with the results of the survey?

• Has the Board seen a copy of the OW Report and is it satisfied the Report does represent the responses provided?

• OW has indicated that there was not a recommendation to sack the coach.  Is this correct?

• If this is the case, why was the survey referenced publicly in Alen Stajic’s sacking?

• Was the OW survey actually a factor in the recommendation to sack Alen Stajcic?